Share:


Applications of fuzzy multiple criteria decision making methods in civil engineering: a state-of-the-art survey

    Zhi Wen Affiliation
    ; Huchang Liao   Affiliation
    ; Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas Affiliation
    ; Jurgita Antuchevičienė Affiliation

Abstract

A variety of fuzzy multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) models have been proposed to solve complicated decision-making problems. Many applications have been achieved, especially in the field of civil engineering. To analyze the developments about the fuzzy MCDM methods and their applications in civil engineering in recent years and further explore the future research directions, this study conducts a state of the art survey in which 52 journal papers focusing on the applications of fuzzy MCDM models in civil engineering from 2016 to 2020 are reviewed. We respectively classify these articles according to research problems and research methods. Through the literature review, we get findings in terms of the most concerned decision-making problem, the most widely-used evaluation criterion and the most popular fuzzy MCDM model. Furthermore, we present four aspects of research challenges and corresponding future research directions in the field of civil engineering, which may be helpful for researchers and practitioners to further investigate.

Keyword : civil engineering, multiple criteria decision making, fuzzy set, fuzzy multiple criteria decision making, literature review

How to Cite
Wen, Z., Liao, H., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2021). Applications of fuzzy multiple criteria decision making methods in civil engineering: a state-of-the-art survey. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 27(6), 358-371. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2021.15252
Published in Issue
Jul 15, 2021
Abstract Views
2011
PDF Downloads
1419
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Abdel-malak, F. F., Issa, U. H., Miky, Y. H., & Osman, E. A. (2017). Applying decision-making techniques to civil engineering projects. Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(4), 326–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjbas.2017.05.004

Afshari, A. R. (2017). Methods for selection of construction project manager: Case study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(12), 06017003. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001400

Alireza, M., & Abimbola, W. (2019). Key uncertainty events impacting on the completion time of highway construction projects. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 6, 275–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42524-019-0022-7

Amini, M., Zhang, B., & Chang, S. (2018). Selecting building designs with consideration of sustainability and resiliency. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 24(1), 04018001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)ae.1943-5568.0000298

Andrić, J. M., & Lu, D. G. (2016). Risk assessment of bridges under multiple hazards in operation period. Safety Science, 83, 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.11.001

Bellman, R. E., & Zadeh, L. A. (1970). Decision-making in a fuzzy environment. Management Science, 17(4), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.17.4.B141

Boostani, A., Jolai, F., & Bozorgi-Amiri, A. (2018). Optimal location selection of temporary accommodation sites in Iran via a hybrid fuzzy multiple-criteria decision making approach. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 144(4), 04018039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000479

Bruno, G., Esposito, E., Genovese, A., & Simpson, M. (2016). Applying supplier selection methodologies in a multi-stakeholder environment: A case study and a critical assessment. Expert Systems with Applications, 43, 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.016

Chatterjee, K., Zavadskas, E. K., Tamošaitienė, J., Adhikary, K., & Kar, S. (2018). A hybrid MCDM technique for risk management in construction projects. Symmetry, 10(2), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10020046

Chen, L., & Pan, W. (2016). BIM-aided variable fuzzy multicriteria decision making of low-carbon building measures selection. Sustainable Cities and Society, 27, 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.04.008

Dahooie, J. H., Zavadskas, E. K., Abolhasani, M., Vanaki, A., & Turskis, Z. (2018). A novel approach for evaluation of projects using an interval-valued fuzzy additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method: A case study of oil and gas well drilling projects. Symmetry, 10(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10020045

Ding, S. B., Wang, X. L., & Wang, H. Y. (2016). Engine selection based on utility theory. Transactions of Nanjing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 33(6), 639–646.

Ebrahiminejad, M., Shakeri, E., Ardeshir, A., & Zarandi, M. (2018). An object-oriented model for construction method selection in buildings using fuzzy information. Energy and Buildings, 178, 228–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2018.08.002

El Chanati, H., El-Abbasy, M. S., Mosleh, F., Senouci, A., Abouhamad, M., Gkountis, I., Zayed, T., & Al-Derham, H. (2016). Multi-criteria decision making models for water pipelines. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 30(4), 04015090. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000842

Erdoğan, M., & Kaya, İ. (2016). A combined fuzzy approach to determine the best region for a nuclear power plant in Turkey. Applied Soft Computing, 39, 84–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2015.11.013

Fallahpour, A., Wong, K. Y., Rajoo, S., Olugu, E. U., Nilashi, M., & Turskis, Z. (2020). A fuzzy decision support system for sustainable construction project selection: an integrated FPP-FIS model. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 26(3), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.12183

Galende-Hernández, M., Menéndez, M., Fuente, M. J., & SainzPalmero, G. I. (2018). Monitor-While-Drilling-based estimation of rock mass rating with computational intelligence: The case of tunnel excavation front. Automation in Construction, 93, 325–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2018.05.019

Gou, L. F., & Zhong, Y. (2019). A new fault diagnosis method based on attributes weighted neutrosophic set. IEEE Access, 7, 117740–117748. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2936494

Hafezalkotob, A., Hafezalkotob, A., Liao, H. C., & Herrera, F. (2020). Interval MULTIMOORA method integrating interval Borda rule and interval best-worst-method-based weighting model: Case study on hybrid vehicle engine selection. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 50(3), 1157–1169. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2018.2889730

Hatefi, S. M., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2019). An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL-fuzzy ANP model for evaluating construction projects by considering interrelationships among risk factors. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 25(2), 114–131. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2019.8280

Hocine, A., Zhuang, Z. Y., Kouaissah, N., & Li, D. C. (2020). Weighted-additive fuzzy multi-choice goal programming (WA-FMCGP) for supporting renewable energy site selection decisions. European Journal of Operational Research, 285(2), 642–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.02.009

Hosseini, S. T., Lale Arefi, S., Bitarafan, M., Abazarlou, S., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2016). Evaluation types of exterior walls to reconstruct Iran earthquake areas (Ahar Heris Varzeqan) by using AHP and fuzzy methods. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 20(3), 328–340. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715x.2016.1190794

Huang, M., Zhang, X. L., Ren, R. X., Liao, H. C., Zavadskas, E. K., & Antuchevičienė, J. (2020). Energy-saving building program evaluation with an integrated method under linguistic environment. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 26(5), 447–458. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.12647

Ilbahar, E., Karaşan, A., Cebi, S., & Kahraman, C. (2018). A novel approach to risk assessment for occupational health and safety using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP & fuzzy inference system. Safety Science, 103, 124–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.025

Inti, S., & Tandon, V. (2017). Application of fuzzy preference– analytic hierarchy process logic in evaluating sustainability of transportation infrastructure requiring multicriteria decision making. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 23(4), 04017014. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000373

Issa, U. H., Miky, Y. H., & Abdel-Malak, F. F. (2019). A decision support model for civil engineering projects based on multi-criteria and various data. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 25(2), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2019.7551

Jang, W., Lee, S. K., & Han, S. H. (2018). Sustainable performance index for assessing the green technologies in urban infrastructure projects. Journal of Management in Engineering, 34(2), 04017056. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000582

Jato-Espino, D., Indacoechea-Vega, I., Gáspár, L., & Castro-Fresno, D. (2018). Decision support model for the selection of asphalt wearing courses in highly trafficked roads. Soft Computing, 22(22), 7407–7421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-018-3136-7

Javadi, M., Saeedi, G., & Shahriar, K. (2017). Developing a new probabilistic approach for risk analysis, application in underground coal mining. Journal of Failure Analysis and Prevention, 17(5), 989–1010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11668-017-0325-0

Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2018). A dynamic fuzzy approach based on the EDAS Method for multi-criteria subcontractor evaluation. Information, 9(3), 68. https://doi.org/10.3390/info9030068

Leśniak, A., Kubek, D., Plebankiewicz, E., Zima, K., & Belniak, S. (2018). Fuzzy AHP application for supporting contractors’ bidding decision. Symmetry, 10(11), 642. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10110642

Liang, R., Dong, Z. J., Sheng, Z. H., Wang, X. Y., & Wu, C. Z. (2017). Case study of selecting decision-making schemes in large-scale infrastructure projects. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 23(4), 06017001. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) IS.1943-555X.0000364

Liao, H. C., & Wu, X. L. (2020). DNMA: a double normalizationbased multiple aggregation method for multi-expert multicriteria decision making. Omega, 94, 102058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.04.001

Liao, H. C., Xu, Z. S., & Zeng, X. J. (2014). Distance and similarity measures for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their application in multi-criteria decision making. Information Sciences, 271, 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2014.02.125

Liao, H. C., Wu, X. L., Liang, X. D., Yang, J. B., Xu, D. L., & Herrera, F. (2018). A continuous interval-valued linguistic ORESTE method for multi-criteria group decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 153, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2018.04.022

Maghsoodi, A. I., & Khalilzadeh, M. (2017). Identification and evaluation of construction projects’ critical success factors employing fuzzy-TOPSIS approach. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 22(5), 1593–1605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-1970-2

Mahamadu, A. M., Manu, P., Mahdjoubi, L., Booth, C., Aigbavboa, C., & Abanda, F. H. (2019). The importance of BIM capability assessment. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 27(1), 24–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2018-0357

Martin, H., Lewis, T. M., Petersen, A., & Peters, E. (2017). Cloudy with a chance of fuzzy: building a multicriteria uncertainty model for construction project delivery selection. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 31(1), 04016046. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000614

Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2015). Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications – Two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Systems with Applications, 42(8), 4126–4148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003

Mazher, K. M., Chan, A. P. C., Zahoor, H., Khan, M. I., & Ameyaw, E. E. (2018). Fuzzy integral–based risk-assessment approach for public–private partnership infrastructure projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 144(12), 04018111. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001573

Mi, X. M., Tang, M., Liao, H. C., Shen, W. J., & Lev, B. (2019). The state-of-the-art survey on integrations and applications of the best worst method in decision making: Why, what, what for and what’s next? Omega, 87, 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.01.009

Mohandes, S. R., Sadeghi, H., Mahdiyar, A., Durdyev, S., Banaitis, A., Yahya, K., & Ismail, S. (2020). Assessing construction labours’ safety level: a fuzzy MCDM approach. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 26(2), 175–188. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.11926

Nyongesa, H. O., Musumba, G. W., & Chileshe, N. (2017). Partner selection and performance evaluation framework for a construction-related virtual enterprise: a multi-agent systems approach. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 13(5), 344–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2017.1324398

Omar, T., Nehdi, M. L., & Zayed, T. (2017). Performance of NDT techniques in appraising condition of reinforced concrete bridge decks. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 31(6), 04017104. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001098

Osei-Kyei, R., & Chan, A. P. C. (2017). Developing a project success index for public–private partnership projects in developing countries. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 23(4), 04017028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000388

Owusu, E. K., Chan, A. P. C., Hosseini, M. R., & Nikmehr, B. (2020). Assessing procurement irregularities in the supplychain of Chanaian construction projects: A soft-computing approach. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 26(1), 66–82. https://doi.org/10.3846/jcem.2020.11659

Pang, Q., Wang, H., & Xu, Z. S. (2016). Probabilistic linguistic term sets in multi-attribute group decision making. Information Science, 369, 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2016.06.021

Patel, D. A., & Jha, K. N. (2017). Developing a process to evaluate construction project safety hazard index using the possibility approach in India. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(1), 04016081. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001205

Plebankiewicz, E., & Kubek, D. (2016). Multicriteria selection of the building material supplier using AHP and fuzzy AHP. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 142(1), 04015057. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001033

Plebankiewicz, E., Meszek, W., Zima, K., & Wieczorek, D. (2020). Probabilistic and fuzzy approaches for estimating the life cycle costs of buildings under conditions of exposure to risk. Sustainability, 12(1), 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010226

RazaviAlavi, S., & AbouRizk, S. (2017). Genetic algorithmsimulation framework for decision making in construction site layout planning. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(1), 04016084. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001213

Rezakhani, P., & Maghiar, M. (2019). Fuzzy analytical solution for activity duration estimation under uncertainty. ASCEASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, 5(4), 04019014. https://doi.org/10.1061/AJRUA6.0001020

Rodríguez, R. M., Martinez, L., & Herrera, F. (2012). Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 20(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2170076

Satapathy, S., Kumar, S., Garanayak, A., & Pani, A. (2018). An analysis of physical disorders of workers at construction site: a fuzzy-AHP ranking. International Journal of Business Excellence, 14(2), 212–239. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2018.089151

Smarandache, F. (2015). Symbolic neutrosophic theory. http://arxiv.org/abs/1512.00047v1

Song, X. L., Zhong, L., Zhang, Z., Xu, J. P., Shen, C., & Peña-Mora, F. (2018). Multistakeholder conflict minimization-based layout planning of construction temporary facilities. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 32(2), 04017080. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000725

Taylan, O., Kabli, M. R., Porcel, C., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2017). Contractor selection for construction projects using consensus tools and big data. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 20(4), 1267–1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-017-0312-3

Tomczak, M., & Rzepecki, L. (2017). Evaluation of supply chain management systems used in civil engineering. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 245, 072005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/245/7/072005

Utama, W. P., Chan, A. P. C., Zahoor, H., Gao, R., & Jumas, D. Y. (2019). Making decision toward overseas construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26(2), 285–302. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2018-0016

Vo, K. D., Nguyen, P. T., & Phan, P. T. (2018). Job performance factors of civil engineers in Vietnam. Journal of Mechanics of Continua and Mathematical Sciences, 14(5), 571–575. https://doi.org/10.26782/jmcms.2019.10.00041

Wallenius, J., Dyer, J. S., Fishburn, P. C., Steuer, R. E., Zionts, S., & Deb, K. (2008). Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: Recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Management Science, 54(7), 1336–1349. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0838

Wang, T. K., & Piao, Y. (2019). Development of BIM-AR-based facility risk assessment and maintenance system. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 33(6), 04019068. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001339

Wieczorek, D., Plebankiewicz, E., & Zima, K. (2019). Model estimation of the whole life cost of a building with respect to risk factors. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2019.7455

Wu, X. L., & Liao, H. C. (2019). A consensus-based probabilistic linguistic gained and lost dominance score method. European Journal of Operational Research, 272, 1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.07.044

Xiao, Y., & Zhang, C. H. (2016). A new method for financial decision making under intuitionistic linguistic environment. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 50(3), 303–318.

Yoon, J. H., & Cha, H. S. (2018). Optimal FM strategy for commercial office buildings using fuzzy synthetic evaluation. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 32(3), 04018025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001176

Yu, Y., Darko, A., Chan, A. P. C., Chen, C., & Bao, F. Y. (2018). Evaluation and ranking of risk factors in transnational public-private partnerships projects: Case study based on the intuitionistic fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 24(4), 04018028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000448

Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8, 338– 353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X

Zavadskas, E., Antucheviciene, J., Vilutiene, T., & Adeli, H. (2017). Sustainable decision-making in civil engineering, construction and building technology. Sustainability, 10(2), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010014

Zhang, L., Ding, L., Wu, X., & Skibniewski, M. J. (2017). An improved Dempster–Shafer approach to construction safety risk perception. Knowledge-Based Systems, 132, 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2017.06.014

Zhao, X. J., Chen, L., Pan, W., & Lu, Q. C. (2017). AHP-ANP– fuzzy integral integrated network for evaluating performance of innovative business models for sustainable building. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(8), 04017054. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001348

Zolfaghari, S., & Mousavi, S. M. (2018). Construction-project risk assessment by a new decision model based on De-Novo multi-approaches analysis and hesitant fuzzy sets under uncertainty. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 35(1), 639–649. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-162013

Zyoud, S. H., Kaufmann, L. G., Shaheen, H., Samhan, S., & Fuchs-Hanusch, D. (2016). A framework for water loss management in developing countries under fuzzy environment: Integration of fuzzy AHP with fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 61, 86–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2016.05.016