Entrepreneurship and digitalisation in EU: twinning insights through a panel threshold regression
Abstract
The study methodologically employs, in a novel perspective, the panel threshold analysis, considering the time frame 2006–2020, to capture the relationship between new business density rate, as a proxy for entrepreneurship, and individuals’ digital inclusion, as a proxy for digitalisation in EU countries. Based on the human capital theory, the results indicated a strong single threshold effect between individuals’ digital inclusion and new business creation, confirming that entrepreneurship is influenced by the skills, knowledge, and experience of the entrepreneurs, including their education, training, and work history. For EU countries, individuals’ digital inclusion boosts business creation only after reaching a certain level. When separating the EU countries from the perspective of their Innovation Index performance, the threshold effect was statistically evidenced in all categories but with different values. The strongest positive influence from digitalisation towards entrepreneurship was visible in emerging countries, while the lowest was for countries classified as moderate innovators. The research provides an original framework for understanding the complex factors that drive entrepreneurship and can help researchers and practitioners develop strategies for promoting entrepreneurial activity. Digitalisation’s opportunities are significant, and entrepreneurial individuals and organisations able to adapt and innovate are more likely to be successful.
Keyword : digitalisation, entrepreneurship, innovation, human capital, EU countries, panel threshold
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Baranauskas, G., & Raišienė, A. G. (2022). Transition to digital entrepreneurship with a quest of sustainability: Development of a new conceptual framework. Sustainability, 14(3), Article 1104. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031104
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Blichfeldt, H., & Faullant, R. (2021). Performance effects of digital technology adoption and product & service innovation – A process-industry perspective. Technovation, 105, Article 102275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102275
Bostan, I., Bunget, O. C., Dumitrescu, A. C., Burca, V., Domil, A., Mates, D., & Bogdan, O. (2022). Corporate disclosures in pandemic times: The annual and interim reports case. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 58(10), 2910–2926. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2021.2014316
Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., & de Reuver, M. (2019). Digitalisation, business models, and SMEs: How do business model innovation practices improve performance of digitalising SMEs? Telecommunications Policy, 43(9), Article 101828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2019.101828
Carbó-Valverde, S., Cuadros-Solas, P. J., & Rodríguez-Fernández, F. (2022). Entrepreneurial, institutional and financial strategies for FinTech profitability. Financial Innovation, 8(15). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-021-00325-2
Cardella, G. M., Hernández-Sánchez, B. R., & Sánchez-García, J. C. (2020). Women entrepreneurship: A systematic review to outline the boundaries of scientific literature. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01557
Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Esposito, E., Passaro, R., & Quinto, I. (2022). The undigital behavior of innovative startups: Empirical evidence and taxonomy of digital innovation strategies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 28(9), 219–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-08-2021-0626
Chitsaz, E., Tajpour, M., Hosseini, E., Khorram, H., & Zorrieh, S. (2019). The effect of human and social capital on entrepreneurial activities: A case study of Iran and implications. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(3), 1393–1403. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.6.3(24)
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press.
Crăciun, A.-F., Țăran, A.-M., Noja, G. G., Pirtea, M. G., & Răcătăian, R.-I. (2023). Advanced modelling of the interplay between public governance and digital transformation: New empirical evidence from structural equation modelling and Gaussian and mixed-Markov graphical models. Mathematics, 11(5), Article 1168. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11051168
Dabbous, A., Aoun Barakat, K., & Kraus, S. (2023). The impact of digitalisation on entrepreneurial activity and sustainable competitiveness: A panel data analysis. Technology in Society, 73, Article 102224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102224
Diener, F., & Špaček, M. (2020). The role of ‘digitalisation’ in German sustainability bank reporting. International Journal of Financial Studies, 8(1), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs8010016
Diener, F., & Špaček, M. (2021). Digital transformation in banking: A managerial perspective on barriers to change. Sustainability, 13(4), Article 2032. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042032
Dutta, N., & Sobel, R. S. (2018). Entrepreneurship and human capital: The role of financial development. International Review of Economics & Finance, 57, 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2018.01.020
Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T., & Stephan, U. (2016). Human capital in social and commercial entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(4), 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.05.003
Eurostat. (2022a). Economic sentiment indicator. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/teibs010
Eurostat. (2022b). Individuals – frequency of internet use. https://doi.org/10.2908/ISOC_CI_IFP_FU
European Commission. (2023). European Innovation Scoreboard 2023 and Regional Innovation Scoreboard 2023. https://ec.europa.eu/research-and-innovation/en/statistics/performance-indicators/european-innovation-scoreboard/eis#
Ferreira, J. J., Fernandes, C. I., Veiga, P. M., & Caputo, A. (2022). The interactions of entrepreneurial attitudes, abilities and aspirations in the (twin) environmental and digital transitions? A dynamic panel data approach. Technology in Society, 71, Article 102121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102121
Ghazy, N., Ghoneim, H., & Lang, G. (2022). Entrepreneurship, productivity and digitalisation: Evidence from the EU. Technology in Society, 70, Article 102052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102052
Goldschlag, N., & Tabarrok, A. (2018). Is regulation to blame for the decline in American entrepreneurship? Economic Policy, 33(93), 5–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/epolic/eix019
Growth Lab Harvard University. (2020). Country & product complexity rankings. https://atlas.cid.harvard.edu/rankings
Hansen, B. E. (1999). Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics, 93(2), 345–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(99)00025-1
Huđek, I., Tominc, P., & Širec, K. (2021a). The impact of social and cultural norms, government programs and digitalisation as entrepreneurial environment factors on job and career satisfaction of freelancers. Sustainability, 13(2), Article 779. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020779
Huđek, I., Tominc, P., & Širec, K. (2021b). The human capital of the freelancers and their satisfaction with the quality of life. Sustainability, 13(20), Article 11490. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132011490
Iancu, A., Popescu, L., Varzaru, A. A., & Avram, C. D. (2022). Impact of Covid-19 crisis and resilience of small and medium enterprises: Evidence from Romania. Eastern European Economics, 60(4), 352–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/00128775.2022.2032177
Ivanová, E., Žárská, V., & Masárová, J. (2021). Digitalization and human capital development. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 9(2), 402–415, https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2021.9.2(26)
Khalid, R., Raza, M., Sawangchai, A., & Somthawinpongsai, C. (2022). The challenging factors affecting women entrepreneurial activities. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs, 8(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.47305/JLIA2281051k
Koch, P. (2021). Economic complexity and growth: Can value-added exports better explain the link? Economics Letters, 198, Article 109682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109682
Lasi, H., Fettke, P., Kemper, H. G., Feld, T., & Hoffmann, M. (2014). Industry 4.0. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 6(4), 239–242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-014-0334-4
Levin, A., Lin, C. F. & Chu, C. S. J. (2002). Unit root tests in panel data: Asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
Lobonţ, O.-R., Nicolescu, A.-C., Costea, F., Li, Z.-Z., Ţăran, A.-M., & Davidescu, A. (2022). A panel threshold model to capture the non-linear nexus between public policy and entrepreneurial activities in EU Countries. Mathematics, 10(8), Article 1265. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10081265
Lopez-Nicolas, C., Nikou, S., Molina-Castillo, F. J., & Bouwman, H. (2020). Gender differences and business model experimentation in European SMEs. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 35(7), 1205–1219. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-05-2019-0194
Madriz, C., Leiva, J. C., & Henn, R. (2018). Human and social capital as drivers of entrepreneurship. Small Business International Review, 2(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.26784/sbir.v2i1.47
Marvel, M. R., Davis, J. L., & Sproul, C. R. (2016). Human capital and entrepreneurship research: A critical review and future directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 40(3), 599–626. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12136
Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254
Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), Article 103773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018
Naudé, W. (2022). From the entrepreneurial to the ossified economy. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 46(1), 105–131. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beab042
Ogrean, C., & Herciu, M. (2021). Romania’s SMEs on the way to EU’s twin transition to digitalisation and sustainability. Studies in Business and Economics, 16(2), 282–295. https://doi.org/10.2478/sbe-2021-0040
Pelikánová, R. M. (2019). R&D expenditure and innovation in the EU and selected member states. Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, 15(1), 13–34. https://doi.org/10.7341/20191511
Pirtea, M. G., Sipos, G. L., & Ionescu, A. (2019). Does corruption affect business innovation? Insights from emerging countries. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 20(4), 715–733. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2019.10160
Pirtea, M. G., Noja, G. G., Cristea, M., & Panait, M. (2021). Interplay between environmental, social and governance coordinates and the financial performance of agricultural companies. Agricultural Economics – Czech, 67(12), 479–490. https://doi.org/10.17221/286/2021-AGRICECON
Poandl, E. M. (2019). Towards digitalization in academic start-ups – An attempt to classify start-up projects of the Gruendungsgarage. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 9(3), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v9i3.9885
Rajahonka, M., & Villman, K. (2019). Women managers and entrepreneurs and digitalization: On the verge of a new era or a nervous breakdown? Technology Innovation Management Review, 9(6), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1246
Rietmann, C. (2023). Corporate responsibility and place leadership in rural digitalisation: The case of Hidden Champions. European Planning Studies, 31(2), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2022.2059345
Schneider, K. (2022). Influences on the entrepreneurial activities of women academics. Psychology, 13(1), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2022.131006
Schultz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.
Schultz, T. W. (1963). The economic value of education (1st ed.). Columbia University Press.
Sklavos, G., Duquenne, M. -N., & Theodossiou, G. (2022). Green entrepreneurship and digital transformation of SMEs in food industry: Α bibliometric analysis. Scientific Annals of Economics and Business, 69(4), 651–668. https://doi.org/10.47743/saeb-2022-0027
Sussan, F., & Acs, Z. J. (2017). The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9867-5
Tok, E. (2020). The incentives and efforts for innovation and entrepreneurship in a resource-based economy: A survey on perspective of Qatari residents. Sustainability, 12(2), Article 626. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020626
Topel, R. H. (1991), Specific capital, mobility, and wages: Wages rise with job seniority. Journal of Political Economy, 99(1), 145–176. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/261744
UNESCO Institute for Statistics (UIS)., & UIS. Stat Bulk Data Download Service (2022). School enrollment, primary and secondary (gross), gender parity index (GPI). The World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.ENR.PRSC.FM.ZS
Witschel, D., Baumann, D., & Voigt, K. (2022). How manufacturing firms navigate through stormy waters of digitalisation: The role of dynamic capabilities, organisational factors and environmental turbulence for business model innovation. Journal of Management & Organization, 28(3), 681–714. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2022.44
World Bank. (2023). School enrollment, secondary (% gross). The World Bank. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.SEC.ENRR
World Bank. (n.d.). New business density (new registrations per 1,000 people ages 15-64). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IC.BUS.NDNS.ZS
Wulff, G. (2022). Changes in market organisation due to exogenous shocks – The case of the transformation of the Swedish fashion industry caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 33(3), 276–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593969.2022.2158119
Zhao, L., Harvie, C., Arjomandi, A., & Suardi, S. (2022). Entrepreneurs and China’s private sector SMEs’ performance. Applied Economics, 54(28), 3279–3295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2021.2006135
Zhu, S., & Li, R. (2017). Economic complexity, human capital and economic growth: Empirical research based on cross-country panel data. Applied Economics, 49(38), 3815–3828. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2016.1270413