Collaborative learning and individual work performance in coworking spaces
Abstract
Coworking spaces are becoming increasingly popular. Throughout literature, coworking spaces are commonly known as collaborative environments. Yet, there is a lack of research on the mechanisms of the collaborative practices within coworking spaces. This research identifies collaborative learning as a major collaborative practice within coworking spaces, and develops a conceptual framework including two other variables: individual motivation to learn and individual work performance. Exploratory factor analysis to establish the reliability and validity of this framework. Next, a survey study was conducted of 169 coworking space members and PLS-SEM was used to do a factor analysis and evaluate the structural model created. It is found that individual motivation to learn positively impacts collaborative learning, collaborative learning positively impacts individual work performance, and that collaborative learning acts as a full mediator between individual motivation to learn and individual work performance. These findings demonstrate how collaborative learning can be key in improving individual work performance in coworking spaces. Furthermore, these findings position collaborative learning as a theory that deserves further attention in coworking space research. These findings also suggest that coworking space operators may want to further encourage collaboration and incentivize learning in their space.
First published online 14 December 2021
Keyword : coworking, coworking space, collaboration, collaborative learning, urban entrepreneurship, individual work performance
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Bilandzic, M. V. (2013). The embodied hybrid space: Designing social and digital interventions to facilitate connected learning in coworking spaces. Queensland University of Technology. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/16749371.pdf
Bilandzic, M., & Foth, M. (2013). Libraries as coworking spaces: Understanding user motivations and perceived barriers to social learning. Library Hi Tech, 31(2), 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831311329040
Billett, S. (2001). Learning in the workplace: Strategies for effective practice. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED465870
Blagoev, B., Costas, J., & Kärreman, D. (2019). “We are all herd animals”: Community and organizationality in coworking spaces. Organization, 26(6), 894–916. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508418821008
Boud, D., Garrick, J., & Greenfield, K. (2000). Understanding learning at work. Performance Improvement, 39(10), 45–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4140391013
Bouncken, R. B., Aslam, M. M., & Qiu, Y. (2021). Coworking spaces: Understanding, using, and managing sociomateriality. Business Horizons, 64(1), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.09.010
Bouncken, R., Ratzmann, M., Barwinski, R., & Kraus, S. (2020). Coworking spaces: Empowerment for entrepreneurship and innovation in the digital and sharing economy. Journal of Business Research, 114, 102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.033
Bouncken, R. B., & Reuschl, A. J. (2018). Coworking-spaces: How a phenomenon of the sharing economy builds a novel trend for the workplace and for entrepreneurship. Review of Managerial Science, 12(1), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-016-0215-y
Butcher, T. (2018). Learning everyday entrepreneurial practices through coworking. Management Learning, 49(3), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507618757088
Capdevila, I. (2013). Knowledge dynamics in localized communities: Coworking spaces as microclusters. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2414121
Capdevila, I. (2014). Different inter-organizational collaboration approaches in coworking spaces in Barcelona. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2502816
Capdevila, I. (2015). Co-working spaces and the localised dynamics of innovation in Barcelona. International Journal of Innovation Management, 19(3), 1540004. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2502813
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295–336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Clifton, N., Füzi, A., & Loudon, G. (2019). Coworking in the digital economy: Context, motivations, and outcomes. Futures, 102439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2019.102439
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Comunian, R., & Jacobi, S. (2020). Growing collaborative creative learning spaces: The case of London School of Mosaic. In Collaborative spaces at work (pp. 268–281). Routledge. https://taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780429329425-20/growing-collaborative-creative-learning-spaces-roberta-comunian-silvie-jacobi
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(1), 7. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/pare/vol10/iss1/7/
DeSimone, J. A., Harms, P. D., & DeSimone, A. J. (2015). Best practice recommendations for data screening. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1962
Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Elsevier. https://telearn.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00190240/document
Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630
Foertsch, C. (2019). 2019 state of coworking: Over 2 million coworking space members expected. DESKMAG. http://www.deskmag.com/en/2019-state-of-coworking-spaces-2-million-members-growth-crisis-market-report-survey-study
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382–388. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150980
Fost, D. (2008, February 21). Coworking: A cooperative for the modern age. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/technology/21iht-cowork.1.10263648.html
Gerdenitsch, C., Scheel, T. E., Andorfer, J., & Korunka, C. (2016). Coworking spaces: A source of social support for independent professionals. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 581. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00581
Goermar, L., Barwinski, R. W., Bouncken, R. B., & Laudien, S. M. (2021). Co-Creation in coworking-spaces: Boundary conditions of diversity. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 19(1), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/14778238.2020.1740627
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1–2), 1–12. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2233795
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
Hair, Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. In New challenges to international marketing (pp. 277–319). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: a Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195–204. 3.0.CO;2-7> https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7
Järvelä, S., Volet, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive–situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903433539
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., de Vet, H. C., & van der Beek, A. J. (2014). Measuring individual work performance: Identifying and selecting indicators. Work, 48(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-131659
Kubátová, J. (2014). The cause and impact of the development of coworking in the current knowledge economy. In C. Vivas & P. Sequeiro (Eds.), The Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 571–577). Santarem, Portugal.
Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284919
Macneil, C. (2001). The supervisor as a facilitator of informal learning in work teams. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(6), 246–253. https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000005724
Merkel, J. (2015). Coworking in the city. Ephemera, 15(2), 121–139. https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/14478/
Merkel, J. (2017). Coworking and innovation. In H. Bathelt, P. Cohendet, S. Henn, & L. Simon (Eds.), The Elgar companion to innovation and knowledge creation (pp. 570–586). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782548522.00046
Moilanen, J. (2012). Emerging hackerspaces – peer-production generation. In IFIP advances in information and communication technology: Vol. 378. Open Source Systems: Long-Term Sustainability (pp. 94–111). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33442-9_7
Orel, M., & Almeida, M. D. M. A. (2019). The ambience of collaboration in coworking environments. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 21(4). 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-12-2018-0050
Oxford, R. L. (1997). Cooperative learning, collaborative learning, and interaction: Three communicative strands in the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 81(4), 443–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1997.tb05510.x
Parrino, L. (2015). Coworking: Assessing the role of proximity in knowledge exchange. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 13(3), 261–271. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2013.47
Ramli, N. A., Latan, H., & Nartea, G. V. (2018). Why should PLS-SEM be used rather than regression? Evidence from the capital structure perspective. In Part of the international series in operations research & management science: Vol 267. Partial least squares structural equation modelling (pp. 171–209). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71691-6_6
Reio, Jr, T. G., & Wiswell, A. (2000). Field investigation of the relationship among adult curiosity, workplace learning, and job performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 11(1), 5–30. 3.0.CO;2-A> https://doi.org/10.1002/1532-1096(200021)11:1<5::AID-HRDQ2>3.0.CO;2-A
Rus, A., & Orel, M. (2015). Coworking: A community of work. Teorija in Praksa, 52(6), 1017–1038.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Henseler, J., & Hair, J. F. (2014). On the emancipation of PLS-SEM: A commentary on Rigdon (2012). Long Range Planning, 47(3), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2014.02.007
Singh, B., Selvarajan, T. T., & Solansky, S. T. (2019). Coworker influence on employee performance: A conservation of resources perspective. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 34(8), 587–600. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2018-0392
Smith, B. L., & MacGregor, J. T. (1992). What is collaborative learning. https://www.evergreen.edu/sites/default/files/facultydevelopment/docs/WhatisCollaborativeLearning.pdf
Spinuzzi, C., Bodrožić, Z., Scaratti, G., & Ivaldi, S. (2019). “Coworking is about community”: But what is “Community” in coworking? Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(2), 112–140. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1050651918816357
Tobias, S., & Carlson, J. E. (1969). Brief report: Bartlett’s test of sphericity and chance findings in factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 4(3), 375–377. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0403_8
Waters-Lynch, J., Potts, J., Butcher, T., Dodson, J., & Hurley, J. (2016). Coworking: A transdisciplinary overview. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2712217
Wong, K. K.-K. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1), 1–32. http://marketing-bulletin.massey.ac.nz/V24/MB_V24_T1_Wong.pdf