Share:


Real estate brokerage and endowment effects in the housing market: Evidence from Poland

    Mateusz Tomal Affiliation

Abstract

In the housing market, the prices sellers would be willing to accept to sell their properties exceed the prices buyers would be willing to pay for them. Behavioural economics postulates that this discrepancy is due to the endowment effect, which is a cognitive bias that causes the overvaluation of the goods we own. However, the existing literature lacks theoretical considerations and empirical evidence on the impact of the use of real estate agents by parties to transactions on the endowment effect in the housing market. Therefore, this study aims to assess the influence of real estate brokerage on the endowment effect using the example of the Polish residential market. To achieve the purpose of this study, a lab-in-the-field experiment was conducted with 248 respondents divided into sellers and buyers. The results indicate that the participation of real estate agents during transactions does not lead to the weakening or elimination of the endowment effect but, in some cases, to its intensification, which is due to the framing by buyers and sellers of the commission charged by agents as a loss requiring compensation. This research confirms the inefficiency of commission-based real estate brokerage services and points to possible corrective actions for legislators.

Keyword : endowment effect, real estate agent, real estate brokerage, housing market, behavioural economics, Poland

How to Cite
Tomal, M. (2024). Real estate brokerage and endowment effects in the housing market: Evidence from Poland. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 28(3), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.3846/ijspm.2024.21456
Published in Issue
May 17, 2024
Abstract Views
389
PDF Downloads
368
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

References

Anglin, P. M., & Arnott, R. (1991). Residential real estate brokerage as a principal-agent problem. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 4, 99–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173119

Bao, H. X. (2020). Behavioural science and housing decision making. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429027253

Bao, H. X., & Gong, C. M. (2016). Endowment effect and housing decisions. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 20(4), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2016.1192069

Barwick, P. J., & Pathak, P. A. (2015). The costs of free entry: An empirical study of real estate agents in Greater Boston. The RAND Journal of Economics, 46(1), 103–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-2171.12082

Benjamin, J., Jud, G., & Sirmans, G. (2000). What do we know about real estate brokerage? Journal of Real Estate Research, 20(1–2), 5–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2000.12091034

Bernheim, B. D., & Meer, J. (2013). Do real estate brokers add value when listing services are unbundled? Economic Inquiry, 51(2), 1166–1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.2012.00473.x

Brown, T. C. (2005). Loss aversion without the endowment effect, and other explanations for the WTA–WTP disparity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 57(3), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.10.010

Brzezicka, J., Wisniewski, R., & Figurska, M. (2018). Disequilibrium in the real estate market: Evidence from Poland. Land Use Policy, 78, 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.06.013

Crockett, J. H. (1982). Competition and efficiency in transacting: The case of residential real estate brokerage. Real Estate Economics, 10(2), 209–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00264

Douglas, B. D., Ewell, P. J., & Brauer, M. (2023). Data quality in online human-subjects research: Comparisons between MTurk, Prolific, CloudResearch, Qualtrics, and SONA. Plos One, 18(3), Article e0279720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0279720

Fallis, G. (1985). Housing economics. Toronto.

Gackowska, M. (2023). Istota działalności pośrednika na rynku nieruchomości. Zeszyty Studenckie Wydziału Ekonomicznego Uniwersytetu Gdańskiego Nasze Studia, 13, 161–171.

Gong, C. M., Lizieri, C., & Bao, H. X. (2019). “Smarter information, smarter consumers”? Insights into the housing market. Journal of Business Research, 97, 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.036

Jarecki, P. (2020). Wybrane behawioralne aspekty wyceny nieruchomości. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Łódzkiego. https://doi.org/10.18778/8220-042-3

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

Kokot, S., & Orzechowska, K. (2015). Oczekiwania klientów biur pośrednictwa w obrocie nieruchomościami. Świat Nieruchomości, 1, 13–22.

Kucharska-Stasiak, E. (2014). Behawioralne aspekty w wycenie nieruchomości. Zarządzanie i Finanse, 2(4), 247–261.

Kucharska-Stasiak, E. (2018). Dysfunkcje na rynku nieruchomości w warunkach kryzysu gospodarczego. Bank i Kredyt, 49(5), 493–514.

Levitt, S. D., & Syverson, C. (2008). Market distortions when agents are better informed: The value of information in real estate transactions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(4), 599–611. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.90.4.599

Marsh, A., & Gibb, K. (2011). Uncertainty, expectations and behavioural aspects of housing market choices. Housing, Theory and Society, 28(3), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2011.599182

Miller, N., Sanchez, A., Sklarz, M., & Vamosiu, A. (2021). Saving real estate commissions at any price: Does having a real estate agent influence the sales price of a home? Journal of Housing Research, 30(2), 175–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/10527001.2021.1984756

Ostrowska, I. (2014). Analiza zalet i wad korzystania z usług pośrednictwa w obrocie nieruchomościami na podstawie opinii konsumentów. Marketing i Zarządzanie, 34, 161–171.

Salant, S. W. (1991). For sale by owner: When to use a broker and how to price the house. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 4, 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00173122

Salzman, D., & Zwinkels, R. C. (2017). Behavioral real estate. Journal of Real Estate Literature, 25(1), 77–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.2017.12090455

Shu, S. B., & Peck, J. (2011). Psychological ownership and affective reaction: Emotional attachment process variables and the endowment effect. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21(4), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2011.01.002

Shy, O. (2012). Real estate brokers and commission: Theory and calibrations. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 45(4), 982–1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11146-010-9296-6

Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7

Tomal, M. (2024). The endowment effect and housing markets: Theory and evidence from Poland. Routledge.

Wieland, A., Sundali, J., Kemmelmeier, M., & Sarin, R. (2014). Gender differences in the endowment effect: Women pay less, but won’t accept less. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(6), 558–571. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500006422

Willig, R. D. (1976). Consumer’s surplus without apology. The American Economic Review, 66(4), 589–597.

Wooldridge, J. M. (2018). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach. Cengage.

Yinger, J. (1981). A search model of real estate broker behavior. The American Economic Review, 71(4), 591–605.

Zumpano, L. V., & Hooks, D. L. (1988). The real estate brokerage market: A critical reevaluation. Real Estate Economics, 16(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.00440

Zumpano, L. V., Elder, H. W., & Baryla, E. A. (1996). Buying a house and the decision to use a real estate broker. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 13, 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00154054